Home » News
Home » News

Hax: If he wants to play house he can rent one

Published April 25, 2012 1:01 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2012, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Dear Carolyn • We have been lucky to have open communication with our boys about sex over the years. Now they are 16 and 17 and have girlfriends. The 16-year-old has opted for "everything but" because that makes him feel safest. The 17-year-old is having sex and wants me to allow his 18-year-old girlfriend to spend the night. I have convinced them to get on the pill, but I feel like they should be having sex in the back seats of cars like the rest of us had to. (Ha, just a little humor there!) But seriously, I have given a lot of weak-sounding reasons why they can't have sleepovers, like, "You can't handle the emotions of that kind of thing," but I really need some heavier artillery. They have thoroughly rejected my arguments for abstinence, by the way. Should I stand my ground, or do you think I should just go ahead and host their sex lives?

The Reluctant Hostess

Dear Reluctant Hostess • Not unless you think it's a good idea. You're the parent and this is your house and that does come with privileges. That doesn't solve the problem you touched on with your sorta-but-not-really-a-joke. You're hardly the first parent to do the 2-plus-2 on "allowing" an older teenager to have sex, which is really just accepting that forbidding it is impossible to enforce. It's a huge leap from "It's his life" to "It's his bedroom," though, one a lot of parents rightly don't feel comfortable making, even while acknowledging the practical absurdity of the result: "You have my blessing to sneak around and get a little wherever you can — responsibly! — without getting busted." This brings us back to the head-of-household privilege. Your 17-year-old boy is not only still a minor, but also does not have the financial and institutional standing to support himself. Instead, he lives at home, becoming an adult incrementally on his parents' dime. It makes no sense for parents to absorb the money and decision-making burdens of adulthood while just handing their kids the perks. If Junior wants to play house, then he can rent house. If he doesn't like the back seat, then he can be resourceful, or abstinent.

Carolyn Hax's column runs Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays.






Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus