Home » News
Home » News

Letter: Utah defense of marriage ban is offensive

Published February 8, 2014 1:01 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2014, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

I just want to express my deep offense at Utah's incredibly lame "defense" of its institutionalized bigotry, Amendment 3 (Utah makes it all about kids in brief against same-sex marriage," Tribune, Feb. 3).

The arguments used by those who'd discriminate based on sexual orientation have long been ridiculous — as if someone's marriage can in any way be a threat to another's, for example. But to denigrate every family except those of "biological moms and dads" is beyond insulting.

Does that mean my stepkids are worse off for being with me instead of having their DNA donors stay together in a dysfunctional relationship? Or that a spouse who has lost her partner in the line of duty is somehow less of a parent?

The fact that this moronic tactic is funded by my tax dollars makes this all the more offensive.

It's about time those who proclaim to be leaders and those who claim fealty to any deity to start including everyone in their plans, not just those who toe the same line they do, with the compassion religions always preach.

Mike Coronella





Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus