Home » News
Home » News

FLDS retorts: Raid violated the sect's rights

Published April 8, 2008 12:59 am

Isaac Jeffs, Merrill Jessop file motions, say search focus too broad
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2008, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

SAN ANGELO, Texas - For the first time, the FLDS have responded to the state raid on the YFZ Ranch that began last Thursday and just now is nearing completion.

In five filings released Monday, Isaac Jeffs and Merrill Jessop said the sect's constitutional rights were violated in a massive search that was overly broad and vague in its focus.

Merrill Jessop oversees the ranch and its residents. Isaac Jeffs is the brother of Warren S. Jeffs, who led the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints until he was convicted last year of two counts of being an accomplice to rape.

Isaac Jeffs was with his brother when Warren S. Jeffs was arrested outside Las Vegas in 2006. The charges against Warren S. Jeffs were based on a marriage he conducted between a 14-year-old girl and her 19-year-old cousin in 2001.

Attorneys Evan Pierce-Jones and Nathan Butler, of San Angelo, and Patrick T. Peranteau, of San Antonio, are representing Jessop and Isaac Jeffs, who also filed documents objecting to the raid on behalf of the FLDS Church.

A hearing is set for Wednesday before 51st District Judge Barbara Walther to hear the men's motions.

The men say it is "impossible" that the sealed affidavit that triggered the investigation at the ranch listed sufficient evidence to search "each and every residence, structure, school, vehicle, place of business, temple or other facility."

The filing describes the ranch as an "unincorporated city or neighborhood of 300 to 400 residents" that includes single and multiple family homes, a doctor's office, a cheese manufacturing plant, a cement plant and other buildings spread over 1,691 acres.

The men also point out that the arrest and search warrants targeting Dale Barlow are moot since he has been located in Colorado City, Ariz.

The motions, which were filed Saturday at 11 a.m., also objected to law officers entering the temple located on the ranch.

FLDS members "consider it a desecration of one of their holiest sites for a non-member to enter their temple," it said. "Such a desecration would be irreparable."

A second document said the temple contains no birth, marriage or other records listed in the search warrant and that the Texas Constitution "will not permit the rummaging through of a sanctified religious sanctuary . . . any more than it would permit authorities to rummage through the Vatican."

It said the temple has six gates that could be easily secured for a brief period - suggesting that the FLDS were willing to let the officers enter the building briefly.

About 12 hours later, a SWAT team did enter the temple and took just five minutes to secure it.

Allison Palmer, assistant district attorney for the 51st District, filed a response that said neither men has standing or a legal right to participate in the matter or an expectation of privacy on the ranch. She also said arguments to suppress evidence seized are premature.

Meanwhile in Arizona, Mohave County Chief Probation Officer Friendly Walker said he has not been informed of any warrants for Barlow's arrest. As of Monday night, Walker believed Barlow was still free.

"I've got a call into detectives [in Texas] to find out what's going on," Walker said.




Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus