This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.
In "A woman's right?" (Forum, Jan. 25), Pat Schneiter asked women to "please consider adoption" instead of abortion. She claimed there are "many couples" who "would love to take these babies."
It is a fallacy that adoption is the answer to the abortion debt. The United Nations Children's Fund estimates that there are 210 million orphaned children in the world. I see that as evidence that there is a lack of couples or families willing to feed, cloth and shelter the unwanted children of the world.
What responsibilities do we have to the millions of children already looking for a home? Is it sensible to add one more child to the statistic? Please stop pretending that the abortion debt is so easily solved by adoption.
It is important to take a good look at the race, class and gender of the women and children involved in this discussion, and then maybe we can have a more productive dialogue.