Re "Records: Cops had big doubts about Josh" (Tribune, June 11):
At a risk of sounding insensitive, I no longer read articles about Susan and Josh Powell. However, I respect those who need to know every inconsequential detail about this unfortunate family.
But does The Tribune need to accompany all such articles with a disturbingly morose portrait of Josh Powell? By now, doesn't everyone in Utah know what this man looked like? Must we look at his face on the front page of the paper first thing in the morning?
If you must fill the front page with yet another article about this family that sheds no light on the whereabouts of Susan Powell, please refrain from adding this man's picture to it.
Salt Lake City