Quantcast
Home » News
Home » News

Yearlong wait for DNA testing results frustrates Utah judge, who threatens to put a crime lab employee in jail

Published November 28, 2016 1:46 pm

Courts • Defendant sits in jail as sex-assault case languishes for lack of DNA results.
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2016, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

A Utah judge frustrated over a lack of DNA results from the state crime lab said if the results aren't complete by next month, he'll put a crime lab employee behind bars.

Christopher Lee Monson has been in jail for the past 13 months, after prosecutors in Davis County charged him with rape and attempted kidnapping in connection with an alleged assault of his ex-girlfriend last October.

A seven-day trial had been scheduled for next month, but Monson's attorney, Mary Corporon, told 2nd District Judge Thomas Kay in a mid-November hearing that attorneys still have not received the DNA results of a rape kit that was completed last year.



She told Kay that she doesn't know if the evidence will help or hurt Monson's defense — but said she can't go forward with the trial without the results, according to a recording of the court hearing.

Kay told attorneys he will sign an order demanding that someone from the state crime lab come to a Dec. 15 hearing and explain what has happened to the rape kit and where the results are.

"I've set this trial months and months and months [ago] and the defendant is in custody," the judge said, according to the recording. "This is ridiculous. … I want a human being here who is going to take some responsibility. It means he's going to, or she's going to, have [the results] or there's going to be some good reason that they are not going to jail."

Not unique • Corporon said Wednesday that her client's case is hardly unique. He is not the first defendant to sit in jail for months as trial dates are canceled because of a lack of DNA results — and she is not the only defense attorney who has encountered this.

"Over and over again, in cases in which sex crimes are alleged, the critical DNA evidence is not available for many months, or a year or more," she wrote in an email to The Salt Lake Tribune. "This impacts everyone in the system."

It impacts her clients, she said, as they remain in jail and cannot have a speedy trial. For those falsely accused, their cases languish for months or years as they wait for evidence that might exonerate them. It affects victims who are waiting for closure. And it impacts taxpayers who pay for lawyers and court staff to come to court time and time again to discuss where the evidence is.

"The problem is not that we humans don't know how to process DNA evidence," Corporon wrote. "The problem is the state of Utah will not allocate enough funds to hire enough qualified scientists and create enough state-of-the-art laboratories to process the quantity of evidence being collected. This is purely and simply an issue of not valuing the Bill of Rights, and victim's rights, enough to allocate the funds necessary to guarantee those rights."

Jay Henry, the state crime lab director, said last week that his staffers have an "exceptional caseload" right now. While in the past, they have received a few hundred rape kits a year to process, they recently have been receiving between 500 and 700 a year. That is in addition, he said, to a backlog of thousands of untested kits that the crime lab is still sorting through.

They have outsourced many of those kits to outside labs, Henry said, but the lab is still bogged down with so much work to do.

"Right now, our turnaround time isn't the best," he said. "We're at over a year right now [on average] with our turnaround time. We think we're starting to make improvement — I think we've gotten through the worst of it."

With new training and a new crime lab building that employees will move into next month, Henry said he hopes they can reduce that time to between 60 and 90 days. Because he did not have details about the DNA testing in Monson's case, Henry said he could not comment about that matter specifically.

He said the crime lab has seen an increase of work because, as technology gets better, police are submitting more and more cases for DNA testing.

"The kits have gotten better," he said. "We're getting better results with less sample. We're giving law enforcement what they've always wanted — they're solving crimes."

Looking forward • For Monson, who has been in the county jail in lieu of a $100,000 cash bail since Oct. 3, 2015, he will continue to wait.

At the November hearing, attorneys canceled his December trial date and reset it for early April.

During that hearing, Corporon told the judge that the prosecutors should not be faulted for the lack of completed evidence.

Deputy Davis County Attorney Susan Hunt said at the hearing that she periodically has checked in with the state crime lab and has been told that the kit in Monson's case was outsourced to a private lab, and is expected back by next month. She added that the same private lab also completed and returned results for DNA testing in a rape case that was opened just last month.

"I don't know why this case has taken longer or why this is a problem," Hunt told the judge.

Monson, 27, was arrested last October after a woman who had recently broken off a relationship with him reported to police that he raped her. She told police that Monson tried to restrain her with duct tape and sexually assaulted her in his Layton apartment after she went there to drop off a credit card, according to charging documents.

The woman told police that she persuaded Monson to let her leave the apartment by telling him that she needed to check on an infant she was baby-sitting that she had left in her vehicle. She fled the apartment wearing only a blanket, charges say.

Monson's attorney has argued in court papers that the sex was consensual.

If convicted of either rape or forcible sodomy, Monson faces a maximum penalty of life in prison.

jmiller@sltrib.com

Twitter: @jm_miller

 

 

 

 

 

USER COMMENTS
Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus