Home » News
Home » News

Lee turned down giving tea party response to Obama

Published February 13, 2013 10:33 am

Politics • Utahns in Washington not cheering president's priorities.
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Washington • Sen. Mike Lee turned down a chance to give the Tea Party Express' counter to President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech, though it's clear the Utah Republican would have offered a much different take than the president.

"I liked some of his opening lines, and I disagreed with a lot of other things," Lee said after the speech. "I disagreed with him when he said, if Congress isn't going to do what I want Congress to do when it comes to climate change, I'm going to do it on my own. This has become something of a familiar verse with this president. It's not helpful."

The Tea Party Express instead chose Sen. Rand Paul, Lee's fellow Tea Party Caucus member, to respond to the president's address to Congress as well as the official Republican reaction by Sen. Marco Rubio.

The group discussed the role with several people but chose Paul because he was viewed as best complementing Rubio's response, a spokesman for the tea party umbrella group said, declining to confirm whether Lee was first up for consideration.

Lee said he "just declined" the offer when asked.

"I think at the end of the day the response is more about identifying what our priorities are rather than the personalities, the people who are delivering the response," Lee said.

Lee wasn't the only one who panned the president's speech.

Rep. Chris Stewart, Utah's newest member of Congress attending his first State of the Union, said he was disappointed with it, arguing that Obama glossed over the country's massive debt and out-of-control spending.

"The grave challenge of our day is our debt and our spending; it's controlling the size of the government and it's reinvigorating the economy and I just don't think the president was willing to address it in a meaningful way," Stewart said.

Rep. Rob Bishop, who watched from home, praised Obama for mentioning the significance of families but there were other parts Bishop didn't like.

"Some things actually scared the crap out of me," Bishop, a former school teacher, said in noting the president's call for preschool for all. "The education part especially brings chills to my bones when I think what that could be."

Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, said it's always good for the president to lay out his vision for the country, even if it doesn't mean Congress will follow his lead. Actions are more important than words, the congressman said.

"I'm not looking for a sea change tomorrow morning in terms of what's going on around here," Matheson said.


Emily Andrews contributed to this story.




Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus