Home » News
Home » News

Slow path to kid tax

Published February 21, 2013 9:49 am
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Kelly Francis ("More kids, pay less," Forum, Feb. 10) and Paul Hart ("Pay for big families," Forum, Feb. 17) argue for eliminating the child tax credit so parents would pay their share for educating their children. I agree, but it's unlikely to happen due to the impact of an immediate, large and unplanned expense on those families.

Why not a slow, workable plan that would not penalize today's families?:

1. Announce the plan and cap the number of allowed child deductions.

2. Four years later, reduce by one the number of deductions allowed.

3. Four years later, reduce it one more. Continue doing this every four years until a family unit can claim no more than four deductions.

Every year, teachers seek higher wages from a nonexistent supply of money. They deserve the money, but it isn't there. That supply can never increase enough to make a difference without a new, fairer way to tax the users of the system.

Maxine Babalis

Salt Lake City




Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus