Or maybe he just found a way to get people thinking.
The marker Osmond laid down was a thoughtful essay, posted on the The Senate Site. Entitled "A Practical Argument for Ending Compulsory Education in Utah," it makes the case that the K-12 public education system in Utah has become so overloaded with expectations that it not only teach our children to read, write and figure, but also make up for so many of the woes of modern society, inadequate parenting and economic depravation that it would be better for the state to repeal its law that mandates school attendance for all children below the age of 14.
As befits a Utah politician, he put the case in terms of individual freedom.
"In a country founded on the principles of personal freedom and unalienable rights," Osmond writes, "no parent should be forced by the government to send their child to school under threat of fines and jail time."
But the courts are hardly clogged with parents facing misdemeanor charges for "intentionally or recklessly" failing to enroll their kids in school. And Utah's law is full of loopholes, including home schooling and online education.
What Osmond omits is the fact that public education is offered free for the benefit of children (something he favors), but made compulsory for the benefit of the larger society.
It is compelled on the theory that no family has the right to fail in the duty to educate their children because such a failure harms those around them. It would create, in the words of Salt Lake City School Board member Michael Clara, a "subclass of illiterates on a large scale."
As we don't want to be surrounded by firetrap buildings, open sewers or drunk drivers, we also choose not to be immersed in a crowd of stupid people. That's why education, in civilized societies, is not optional.