Home » News
Home » News

Environmental group sues EPA to enforce clean air law

Published October 10, 2013 6:02 pm
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Denver • An environmental group is alleging that Utah, Idaho and Wyoming have not submitted full plans required by the Clean Air Act to regulate emissions of nitrogen dioxide, which causes air pollution and health problems. 

The allegation is in a lawsuit filed Wednesday by WildEarth Guardians in U.S. District Court in Denver against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The lawsuit states that the agency has failed to comply with the federal act by not issuing a finding that those states and six others, including Colorado, have not submitted the plans as was required by Jan. 22.

WildEarth asserts that a "finding of failure to submit" triggers the start of a two-year deadline for the EPA to promulgate its own plan for how the states must regulate the emissions.

The EPA's website states that healthy persons exposed to nitrogen dioxide from 30 minutes to 24 hours may experience airway inflammation and persons with asthma may experience increased respiratory symptoms.

The EPA was unable to comment on the lawsuit because its regional office in Denver is closed due to the federal government shutdown.

Robert Boczkiewicz




Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus