Home » News
Home » News

U.S. Supreme Court won't hear fetus ultrasound case

Published November 12, 2013 7:51 pm

Oklahoma • State's top court upholding lower court's ruling will stand.
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Oklahoma City • The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to intervene in an overturned Oklahoma law that would have required women seeking abortions to first view an ultrasound image of the fetus, one of several such restrictions approved by legislatures across the country.

It was the second time in just over a week that the nation's highest court declined to hear arguments over a proposed Oklahoma abortion restriction. It previously let stand an Oklahoma court's decision that struck down a separate law restricting drug-induced abortion.

Under the ultrasound measure, approved by the Legislature in 2010 and struck down by the Oklahoma courts, women seeking an abortion would have been required to have an ultrasound exam and then have the image placed in front of them while the provider described the fetus.

Twenty three states had approved laws regulating ultrasounds and abortions, including three with laws similar to the Oklahoma one. Those states are Texas, Louisiana and Wisconsin, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights.

The high court's decision not to hear Oklahoma's case won't impact any of the other states.

Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin said she was disappointed by the court system in this case.

"The U.S. Supreme Court has prohibited states like Oklahoma from banning abortion, despite the fact that our citizens are overwhelmingly pro-life," she said in a statement. "Now the courts have taken their hostility to pro-life legislation a step further, prohibiting the state from providing more information to women about their unborn children."

The Center for Reproductive Rights filed the lawsuit in April 2010 challenging the ultrasound law. A district court judge granted a temporary restraining order against the law in May 2010 and a permanent injunction in March 2012. In December 2012, the Oklahoma Supreme Court upheld the lower court's ruling.




Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus