Home » News
Home » News

In Afghanistan, Iraqi minister talks about failed security pact with U.S.

Published December 3, 2013 7:41 am

Diplomacy • He says Iraq still needs U.S. support combating sectarian violence.
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Kabul, Afghanistan • Iraq's foreign minister said Monday he shared his country's failed experiences in negotiating a U.S. security deal with Afghan officials, who have repeatedly delayed signing a similar agreement with America.

Hoshyar Zebari did not provide details of his talks with President Hamid Karzai in a brief statement after signing an agreement to facilitate pilgrimages to Iraqi religious sites, but hinted that Iraq needed U.S. help to overcome its security challenges after a wave of brutal sectarian violence.

In 2011, the United States and Iraq couldn't agree on terms of a similar security arrangement to keep U.S. troops in that country, and all U.S. forces pulled out. Sectarian violence has plagued Iraq ever since, and some fear Afghanistan could head down that path without a continued U.S. presence if Afghan forces cannot defend the country themselves.

Zebari's brief visit came amid fresh tension with the United States after yet another flare-up with the Afghan government. Karzai's office charged late Sunday that U.S. forces were not delivering fuel to some army and police units as part of an attempt to force the president to sign the security agreement.

The U.S.-led international coalition immediately denied the allegations and said all fuel deliveries to the Afghan National Security Forces were being carried out normally.

Zebari said he shared "our expertise in signing the security agreement with the American forces" and added, "I think it was a very useful exchange of experience" He added that Iraq still needs "continued U.S. support for the security challenges that we are going through."

Zebari did not elaborate, and reporters were not allowed to ask questions during a signing ceremony for a deal to facilitate Afghan Shiites wishing to travel on pilgrimages to holy sites in Iraq.

Although Karzai has endorsed a long-delayed Bilateral Security Agreement with the United States that will keep thousands of troops here past a 2014 deadline, and a national assembly of Afghan dignitaries has approved it, he has repeatedly refused to sign it. Karzai has instead deferred its signature to his successor after April's presidential elections.

The U.S. says it wants the deal signed by the end of next month and has threatened to make plans for a complete pullout after a NATO mandate expires at the end of 2014 if it's not. America's NATO allies have also said they will not keep troops here to train and mentor Afghan forces if America leaves. Although post-2014 numbers have not been announced, it's thought the U.S. will commit about 8,000 forces with NATO supplying an additional 6,000 if the pact is signed.

Also at stake are more than $8 billion annually in funds for Afghan forces and development aid if the deal is not signed.

The United States and its allies not only train, equip and pay the salaries of the 350,000-strong Afghan forces, they also supply them with fuel. According to the office of the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction, the U.S. government paid more than $1.1 billion to fuel the Afghan army from 2007 to 2012.






Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus