"This is the first opinion of its kind where a bankruptcy court has directly expressed the view that the supremacy of U.S. bankruptcy laws trumps state constitutional protections of public pension holders," said Mark Kaufman, senior partner at McKenna, Long & Aldridge, an Atlanta law firm. "The implications of that decision are significant not only to Detroit but also potentially to other cities gauging their level of fiscal distress and how to deal with it."
The decision to approve Detroit's bankruptcy petition capped four months of legal wrangling triggered when the city's emergency manager, citing overwhelmed city services, mounting debt and dwindling tax revenue, filed for bankruptcy protection in July.
"This once proud and prosperous city can't pay its debts. It's insolvent. It's eligible for bankruptcy," Rhodes said from the bench. "At the same time, it also has an opportunity for a fresh start."
Detroit's efforts to get out from under its mountain of debt still faces determined opposition from a broad range of interests, including city workers, retirees, bondholders and others who stand to be hurt financially if the city does not pay all of its bills.
"The only thing we can do is challenge this ruling legally and question the morality of attacking pensions that have been earned by these workers," said Lee Saunders, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which represents many of Detroit's 9,500 city workers. "Pensions in Detroit average $19,000 a year, and there is a good possibility that they will be reduced. That is dead-ass wrong and morally corrupt."
City workers and retirees also expressed dismay, saying any cuts would be too much. "I'm very disappointed," said Rebecca Koller, 45, a Detroit firefighter for the past 14 years. In the past year, she endured a 10 percent pay cut as the city edged toward insolvency. Now she is likely to see her future pension reduced as well. "I do not understand how the city could promise workers something, have them work and do their jobs, and then not provide what was promised and somehow think that is OK."
Under municipal bankruptcy law, Detroit's emergency manager, Kevyn Orr, will begin exploring ways to pay some of its debt while restoring and improving city services. Although Orr can propose a reorganization plan that pays creditors only a portion of what the city owes them, creditors have a right to contest it. They can also press the city to sell assets or otherwise look for ways to minimize their financial damage. Given that, bankruptcy negotiations are expected to drag on for months.
Although Orr has said pension cuts are necessary, Rhodes made it clear that he would allow them to go forward only if the overall plan is "fair and equitable." That legal standard has never been tested in a municipal bankruptcy, putting the case in uncharted legal territory, said Kaufman, who is lead counsel to a state-appointed receiver overseeing fiscally distressed Harrisburg, Pa. "There have been no legal precedents to guide what fair and equitable is in this context," he said.
At a news conference, Orr, a former District of Columbia bankruptcy lawyer, promised that his team would be "thoughtful, measured and humane" in proposing pension cuts. He also said that selling at least parts of the collection held by the Detroit Institute of Arts remains an option for raising money to pay creditors.