Home » News
Home » News

The Washington Post: A public death demands public answers

Published December 7, 2013 1:01 am

The Washington Post
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2013, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

It has been two months since a young mother was fatally shot by police after a dramatic car chase in which White House and U.S. Capitol security barriers were breached. Details have emerged about the woman's history of mental illness, the contents of her car and the number of shots fired. But big issues remain.

Was the use of force proper? Are the right policies and training in place? It is important that these questions be answered in a way that is most transparent to the public.

The investigation into the Oct. 3 shooting of 34-year-old Miriam Carey, who led the Secret Service and Capitol Police on the high-speed chase, is ongoing. The U.S. attorney's office, in conjunction with the D.C. police's internal affairs bureau, is reviewing the circumstances of Ms. Carey's death to determine whether there is criminal or criminal civil rights culpability. The Secret Service and Capitol Police will determine whether officers followed their departments' use-of-force policies and whether changes in practices or policies are needed.

This case involves multiple officers from different agencies and numerous witnesses. The investigation needs to be comprehensive and correct, but there also must be a sense of urgency in determining whether there are lessons to be learned from what everyone agrees was a tragic incident.

The Secret Service and Capitol Police have unique duties to protect federal government personnel and property as well as the public. Ms. Carey's actions — trying to ram a White House barrier, hitting a Secret Service agent, refusing at gunpoint to surrender — were alarming.

But were non-lethal alternatives open to police, particularly since shooting into moving cars is seen as dangerous and ineffective and is generally prohibited or greatly discouraged by most police agencies? Would better training have alerted police to the fact that they were dealing with a woman with mental problems? These are questions best answered by police and security professionals. But the answers, and the reasonings behind them, need to be shared with the public.




Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus