Quantcast
Home » News
Home » News

Mercury News: No U.S. troops to Iraq

Published June 20, 2014 11:34 am

San Jose Mercury News
This is an archived article that was published on sltrib.com in 2014, and information in the article may be outdated. It is provided only for personal research purposes and may not be reprinted.

Trying to follow the turmoil in Iraq can be a bit like reading a Dostoevsky novel for the first time. The intricate plot can be confusing, you need a score card to keep the characters straight, but there's plenty of far-reaching drama.

Make no mistake, there's drama aplenty in Iraq now, and it is so far-reaching that it may affect us all.

The nation invaded by a U.S.-led coalition, torn apart by the ensuing war and struggling to rebuild since then is once again in disarray, and that isn't good for anyone except arms dealers.



Insurgent forces known as ISIS, or Islamic State of Iraq al-Sham, systematically have taken stretches of territory controlled by the Iraqi government. ISIS militias have taken Mosul, the nation's second-largest city, and are moving toward Baghdad against alarmingly impotent resistance.

The forces captured a huge oil refinery in northern Iraq on Wednesday and gained control of what used to be a chemical weapons facility the next day.

These guys are not your garden-variety zealots. They are so radical that even al-Qaida, from whence they arose, considers them extreme. Enough said.

Matters are so strange that there was talk about the U.S. teaming with Iran to help drive ISIS out. It's a bad idea, but it demonstrates the moment's seriousness.

Information is conflicting, muddled or tainted. But we are certain on a few things.

First is the obvious: Iraq is a mess. It has been since before we invaded in 2003. It's possible that the huge divides between Shiites, Sunni and Kurds is so deep that modern Iraq is ungovernable.

Second, ISIS sees what most of us classify as terrorism as merely a means to an end. An Iraq ruled by this faction would be even more of a disaster than the current feckless government has created.

Third, partisan bickering in this country helps not at all. It is irresponsible to treat this complex circumstance as if it can be resolved with pat, bumper-sticker solutions.

Fourth, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki's actions favoring his Shiite brethren are at least partly responsible for ISIS' rise. The Obama administration has made it clear Maliki should leave. But on Thursday, Obama committed to sending military advisers and hinted the U.S. might employ air strikes, if needed.

One thing we can conclude today is that sending U.S. ground troops back into Iraq is no answer.

 

 

 

USER COMMENTS
Reader comments on sltrib.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Salt Lake Tribune. We will delete comments containing obscenities, personal attacks and inappropriate or offensive remarks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. If you see an objectionable comment, please alert us by clicking the arrow on the upper right side of the comment and selecting "Flag comment as inappropriate". If you've recently registered with Disqus or aren't seeing your comments immediately, you may need to verify your email address. To do so, visit disqus.com/account.
See more about comments here.
comments powered by Disqus